Thursday, April 14, 2011

2 Minute Recap from Bricks & Mobile 2011 Conference

A couple of weeks ago, I was lucky enough to speak at a conference called Bricks + Mobile up in Chicago. The focus of the conference was the state of mobile technology, how companies are tapping into the power of the untethered device and where all of this goodness is headed.

Thanks to Kelly Stickel (the conference producer) and Tim Hayden (our panel moderator) for inviting me!

p.s. If you didn't see it, I wrote a blog post framing some of the topics we covered during our panel at B+M.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

How to Earn a Customer's Loyalty

Sunday night, I was flying up to Boston from Austin on US Airways. Not my favorite airline by a longshot but they are reasonably priced and my last few experiences with them have been decent. Anyway, they had wifi on my leg from Charlotte, NC (one of their major hubs) up to Boston. Because it was only an hour and a half, I decided not to pay for the wifi. However, GoGoInflight is running a special right now where they are giving away free Twitter access during April.

As we got closer to Boston I started wondering how close to on time my midnight arrival would be. Given the fact that my Twitter friends are usually up all hours of the night and always very helpful, I thought I'd ask if they might be able to look up my flight status. Of course, I was right and I immediately got several helpful responses. But it was one person in particular -- an employee at a competing airline -- who was kind enough to look for me that really impressed me.

So why was I so enamored with this occurrence? Because with nothing to gain, this person went above and beyond to give me information I needed, when I needed it. If more companies took this approach, there is no doubt in my mind that businesses would win over a lot of new customers. At the end of the day, being helpful is always appreciated, especially when there is no apparent ulterior motive.

Have you ever had this happen to you? If so, share your story in the comments.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Social Media is Better for Experiential Products

Paul Mabray is the chief strategy officer for the wine industry digital think tank, Vintank. Paul is a 17 year veteran in the wine industry and is a regular speaker and blogger.

The race is on.  Everyone is endeavoring to decipher the Rosetta Stone that is Social Media.  Unfortunately, by definition the medium is multi-dimensional and the real applications of social media range from customer support & communication, content distribution, sales, marketing, PR, business intelligence and well beyond.  With all these facets to consider, is it any wonder that there is no silver bullet?

However, a certain segment of industries are positioned to be better served by this medium.  Experiential products clearly stand to benefit more from social media.

Why?  Because social media is fundamentally a channel for sharing and it is inherently human nature to share our experiences.  How many people really enjoy talking about soap? Pencils?  Dishwashers?  Of course, there is dialogue about these types of  products (most of them relate to the buying experience or the quality, or lack thereof,  about the product)  Yes, it is possible to create campaigns to artificially stimulate dialogue about a brand or product.  However, the interaction that occur as a result of natural engagement are more relevant, meaningful, and enduring.  In essence, industries that offer meaningful experiences like wine, food, restaurants, travel, software, and entertainment are natural conduits for conversations that occur on the web.  People enjoy sharing their personal stories and experiences related to these products.  They are vocal and they are prolific. For example, the wine industry and the specialized site  With 140K users this single site has generated 1.8 million conversations about wine.  In fact, in 2010 social media sites generated over 13 million conversations about wine by 3 million online profiles.  KAPOW!

A recent article citing research from IBM suggests that SM consumers do not want intimate relationships with Brands.  This report states that they are primarily looking for tangible benefits from a relationship (discounts, commerce) and they rank “feeling connected” and “part of the community” far lower.  This is not unexpected for traditional retail and non- experiential products.  Do we really want to feel part of the Best Buy community?  Is it important for us to feel part of the Amazon tribe?  How deeply do we really want to be related to Skittles?

Experiential products allow us to feel emotionally attached and we DO want to be “connected” to these brands--- and as a result we are more passionate and vocal about them.  Whether it is a restaurant that has created a memorable experience, a wine that we love, a rock band, a movie, video game, or even a software platform (that’s why companies have dedicated UEX departments) we DO crave more of a relationship with those products.  Equally as important, there is always a very active “prosumer” base that evangelizes and helps spread the message to more and more potential consumers.  These voices are the true influencers in the ecosphere that prostelyze for the brand allowing these brands to be “discovered” via social media through sharing, commenting in forums, “Liking”, and retweeting.  They are also prolific about creating content and messages to help influence potential new customers buying decisions. 

Need proof ? Just look at a company that transcends product and focuses on experience:  Apple.  How many blog posts, tweets, Facebook posts do you see about their products?  

Want other examples? 
Check out the volume of comments and user generated content for the game BioShock

Or the  number of Tweets about Lady GaGa.

Or real experiences being shared on the Fan Page of Morton’s Steak House.

What is most relevant is the natural phenomenon that inspires people to want to authentically share stories about brands and products. There is no need for clever marketing campaigns, to create gimmicks to get your consumers to engage in your community, and no need to create contests to stimulate conversations.

Why is this important?  The major transcendence of social media is how, who and where we get our information.  My good friend Doug Cook (founder of and former director of search for Twitter) has an amazing saying, "search is the fiber that connects the web." He is absolutely correct.  There is nothing you can't find on the web if you know what you are looking for.  Whether it is the most obscure book or replacement part for your 1972 dishwasher, search engines can help you find anything. What search cannot help you do is discover.  That is the role of Social Media.  Seeing authentic (not artificially induced) comments (positive or negative) about brands from people we trust encourages us to explore.  With non-experiential products, brands are almost forced to create gimmicks, marketing campaigns, or contests to stimulate conversation or engagement.  With experiential products, this occurs naturally, without artificial stimulation, and authentically from within our own out networks.  Social media is the human fiber for sharing and discovery. 

The question is, no matter what kind of product you have, are you making it experiential? 

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Onboarding and Engaging with Location Based Services

Next Wednesday, I'm speaking at a very cool event in Chicago called the Bricks + Mobile Conference. If you're in the area, you should absolutely plan to attend (I may even be able to finagle you a discount). I mention this because I'm on a panel with some very smart people including:
  • Tim Hayden, CMO 44Doors (moderator)
  • Adam Beaugh, Director of Social Media, Jackson Family Wines
  • David Javitch, VP of Marketing, Scanlife
  • Jessica Rotnicki-Magaro, Vice President Ecommerce North America, Estee Lauder Companies
The reason I got asked to be on the panel (I think) is that I am now the head of location based marketing at global agency, WCG and am also co-authoring a book called Location Based Marketing for Dummies. In the book, my co-author, Mike Schneider, and I are focusing on how businesses -- large and small -- are tapping into the power of location based marketing. This starts with goals and offers and ends with platforms, measurement and analytics.

One of the main things that Mike and I are focusing on in the book is how businesses can derive real business value by engaging with their customers using location based services. To that end, loyalty is a major outcome that many of the companies like McDonalds, Neiman Marcus and USA Today are seeking as they engage using platforms like foursquare, SCVNGR and Whrrl.

But before companies get to loyalty through regular (hopefully fun and/or educational) interactions with their customers, is there role that location based services can play when it comes to on-boarding and engaging their customers? Of course there is.

For starters, any company that is engaging in location based marketing should consider offers that are not only universal (mayor offers are somewhat overrated), but also that encourage initial and then repeat behavior. There is a local coffeeshop/theater here in Austin, TX called the Hideout that does a nice job on this front. Their offer gives you a 2 for 1 ticket to the theater on your 1st, 5th and 10th checkins (and free admission for the mayor). This provides immediate value the first time you checkin but also keeps you checking in (and ideally coming back) to continue to get your discount.

Where the Hideout (and many other companies fall down) is not letting their customers who aren't using location base services that there is an offer. Why not have a poster up on the wall, a sign on the front door and a trained barista that asks you if you've checked in? Creating a compelling offer and then letting your customers know about it is key.

Another thought when it comes to on-boarding is what if you could check into your new television? Or laptop? Or box of Cheerios? And what if when you checked in you got special instructions (plus a reward)? Well, there are services that are starting to provide this type of functionality like GetGlue. And as of two days ago, GetGlue just announced a partnership with Lionsgate offering 40% off the Blueray DVD set of AMC's popular tv show, Madmen. While this partnership doesn't do much by way of "on-boarding," they are creating fun, excitement and engagement with Madmen fans.

Is your company using location based marketing to on-board, engage and create loyalty with your customers? If so, post about it in the comments section below.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Memories and Milestones

Last night, my friend and former colleague, Rusty Williams, sent me a direct message on Twitter alerting me to the fact that I was on the precipice of a milestone. Sitting at 39,999 tweets, I was one away from my 40,000 update, which if you think about it is a lot. Just think about it... what have you done 40,000 times in your life (if anything)?

As I got thinking, I realized that it would be nice to celebrate this milestone with something worthy, something that helped others, because as I look back through my first 39,999 tweets, I realize just how lucky I am -- both personally and professionally. Over the last four and half years that I've been on Twitter, I've met some amazing people and my family and I have benefited from this experience both personally and professionally.

In the past, I've taken different approaches to milestone tweets. I've been silly and done the fake retirement thing. I've also used the opportunity to dedicate tweets to friends like Jennifer Leggio who have helped me grow and expand my boundaries in social media. But this time, I want it to be different. This time, I want to do something good with my 40,000 update. Something that helps people in need and for those of us that aren't in need, reminds us to pause and celebrate how lucky we are.

Here's my plan and I'd like your help:

  • I just donated $150 to the #SXSWCares which my friends Deb Ng and Leigh Durst helped kick off at South by Southwest Interactive this year. I encourage you to donate too but I also know that money can be tight.
  • After a massive disaster like the one created by the Tsunami in Japan (and now the nuclear fallout) people tend to move on soon after the dust settles. To help keep this fresh in our minds for at least a little while longer, I ask that you retweet this post (there is a RT button at the top of the post) to help spread the word.
  • Once I get to 100 RTs, I will then donate 25 of my next 100 tweets, not just the #SXSWCares but to whatever cause you would like me to (within reason of course). Just leave the name of the cause, the link and a quick blurb as to why this cause is important to you in the comments below and I will make sure it gets tweeted to the people I'm connected with on Twitter.

Thank you in advance for helping me celebrate this marvelous milestone and the multiple memories I've had over my last 39,999 tweets.

Special thanks to: Kyle Flaherty, Jim Storer, Geoff Livingston, David Armano, Chris Brogan and Ken Burbary for helping me think through this.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Samsung Curates SXSWi on their Media Wall

No, this isn't my annual South by Southwest (SXSW) wrap up post. Instead, this is a little shout out to my friends at Samsung, a company I've admired for a while now. I don't have any formal relationship with them although they were kind enough to make me a VIP of the Blogger Lounge, one of my all time favorite places to hang out (and yes, that included a little high-end schwag).

Full disclosure aside, one of the things I love about this company is that they are doing something really smart with their sponsorship dollars at SXSW. Instead of just sponsoring a booth or putting up some giant signs, they worked with JESS3 to create something called the media wall. In the two videos below, I talk to Samsung social media manager, Esteban Contreras, about how they are curating -- one of my favorite topics -- the best of the best content [twitter, Flickr, SlideShare, check-ins, conference sessions, etc.] and posting it up on a giant wall.

Also good for all you SXSW goers who wish they had a way of collecting the best of what SXSWi had to offer, this feed should help.

In the first video clip, you'll hear Esteban talk about the Samsung feed/video wall.

In the second video clip, we'll get to see the wall up close and see the beautiful screen of awesome in full effect.

Thanks again to Samsung for helping make my SXSWi a better experience!

Monday, March 14, 2011

What About The Rest of The World?

This is a continuation of a series of guest blog posts. Today's post comes from good friend and social media big brain, Jason Falls. Jason is a leading thinker on the social media marketing space. He blogs at and is bridging the gap by offering, a learning community geared toward teaching technology, digital and social media marketing to anyone who needs the help.

Insanity seems normal when you live in the asylum. Or so I keep reminding myself of the echo chamber that has emerged in our lovely little Web 2.0 world.

The technologists and developers and marketers and bloggers alike love to throw out statistics to prove their little world is the norm. We (and I'm in the middle of it, too) consistently point to the future as being online, connected, mobile or whatever ... so long as it doesn't involve ink or broadcast waves.
But we're wrong.

Sure, you can throw out Pew Internet and American Life statistics all you want. But you didn't look them up yourself, have no idea of the context of the questions asked and don't realize there's so much missing from the research.

Sure, 79 percent of U.S. adults use the Internet. But the statistic is "use" the internet, not follow you on Twitter. Why aren't we asking how well they use the Internet?

You know what percentage of the U.S. adult population has broadband in their home? Sixty-six percent. One in three people are still on dial-up, Jethro.

So the social fanatics want to say my doomsday drill down is a myth? Pew also tells us that of the 74 percent of U.S. adults online in 2009, the activities they used the web for were, in order, watching videos; getting information about a job; sending instant messages; downloading music and playing games. And of those, only watching videos was more than half of U.S. adults. Social networking? Thirty-five percent. Reading blogs? Thirty-two.

Now, before you go all math on me and say, "Well, 32 percent of U.S. adults is still like 100 million people." Sure, but keep in mind you are in an industry that thinks a 2% click thru rate on an ad and a 25% open rate on an email are good. Your logic is that the more bullets you spray, the more unsuspecting consumers you'll hit.

How about we focus on the 68 percent that don't read blogs? Or the 98 percent that don't click on search ads? Or the 75 percent that don't open your shitty emails?

At a trade show for retailers in a niche industry recently, I spoke with over 150 individuals about digital marketing. One-fourth of them ... 25 percent ... didn't have a website. Talking social media to them was like talking retirement when they couldn't even pay their mortgage.

Think that anecdotal data is misleading? How about the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business's Center for Excellence in Service State of Small Business Report from January of this year? The study, sponsored by Network Solutions (disclosure: I'm on their social media advisory board), showed that only 56 percent of small business owners currently have a website. (Fourty-four percent of small businesses are NOT online.) Only 66 percent say they plan to in the next two years.
Think that's a shocker? Would you believe that when asked how often these companies that do have website update them, 41 percent said no more frequently than every 4-9 months. Ten percent said they update them less than once per year.

Social media use? Just 31 percent have a presence now with 46 percent planning one. Flip the notion before you nod in positive agreement: 69 percent of small businesses are NOT using social media.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau there are 1.2 million businesses in the United States with 10 or more employees. There are 4.5 million with nine employees or fewer. Would you believe that 98 percent of business in America are small businesses? (Those with less than 100 employees.)
That's a big market place of people out there that aren't checking in on Foursquare, aren't following you on Twitter and don't read your precious blog.

There exists a huge gap between those that know the web and those that don't. And it's high time we start being honest with ourselves and realize that social media types are not only in the minority, if web usage were religion, we'd be a fringe cult. No, this doesn't mean the Feds should come blow up our commune. But we've got a lot of work to do before real people -- those outside the echo chamber -- are here to play.

If we don't start bridging the gap and helping mainstream consumers understand and embrace social media marketing, the dot-com bust is going to seem like a market correction.
So, what are you doing to bridge the gap?

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Twitter, Peanut Butter Sandwiches, and the Irresistible Heroes of the School Cafeteria

The following is one in a series of guest posts on the Citizen Marketer 2.1 blog. In addition to being a good friend, Liz Strauss is CEO of SOBCon, a business strategies event, and founder at Inside-Out Thinking, a leadership, loyalty, and customer care training business. She is the author of You'll find her on Twitter as @lizstrauss.

I admit it I was a school geek. Everything about the school experience made me more curious. The good teachers took advantage of that. The not so good ones did their best to ignore it. I was curious about how everyone did things, who they were, why they cared about what they cared about, and the most interesting place of the whole school to me was the school cafeteria.

Back in the olden days, I was short and school books were light because the world had less information. School cafeterias still had cooks and ovens in which they cooked homemade food. Of course, being part of a school, laws and rules set the diet about what they could offer their patrons. For example, every day had to include one serving of bread with the meal. Each month the recommended diet included a huge portion of natural honey as an ingredient.

The brilliant nutritionist, Helen, that ran the school cafeteria knew her customers -- us kids well. So rather than using that honey in bits along the way she used it once a month to deliver a powerful WOW! She mixed the honey into a huge vat of peanut butter to make the most delicious spread.It was secret mixture I've never been fully able to replicate.

That day every month every kid -- even the ones who didn't like peanut butter -- asked for two helpings of bread. Those peanut butter side sandwiches became the currency of the lunch table. Kids traded for favors, to mend friendships, score homework help, and to meet new kids in other classes.

Peanut butter sandwiches were social media at its best.

Helen understood that when you give your customers something spectacular that only you can give, the result is something that your customers can't help but share and talk about. Helen had turned a sandwich into an event. The whole school was connected in a quest to enjoy the best peanut butter sandwiches in the land.

Kids I went to school with still talk about Peanut Butter Day. Helen had a whole school of fiercely loyal fans.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Why Austin Rocks (and Why You Want to Work Here)

There's something unusual going on the universe. I'm not sure what force is behind it but about 3-4 years ago, a new set of "railroad" tracks of sorts -- that of the virtual variety -- were laid down coming from locales north, east and northeast to a little old town in Texas called Austin. Well, Austin's actually not that little. And it happens to be the capitol of Texas. But that's besides the point. The key here is that some of the smartest social business minds in the country are flocking in droves to the live music capital of the world.

While I don't necessarily consider myself in that set of "smartest social business minds," I have worked in the community/social media for business space for the last five plus years. And two and a half years ago, that same force I referenced in the first paragraph drew me like a migratory bird to the ATX (a cutesy little name we like to use to reference the capitol city). Of course it didn't hurt that my former company, Powered, was recruiting me to become their CMO. But that was only one of a dozen factors that played into my attraction to the great city of Austin.

At the risk of rambling on for too long, you'll notice that in this post [orchestrated by one of those great minds, Peter Kim] that a number of the Austin transplants I referenced earlier have weighed in on why they decided to move here to work (or in some cases, stay).

Peter Kim's post is here.
Virginia Miracle's post is here.
Kathy Mandelstein's post is here.
Greg Matthews post is here.
Spike Jone's post is here.
Kate Niederhoffer's post is here.

And to directly "borrow" Peter's closing quote...

"Our town will soon welcome 15,000+ visitors for SXSWi. You might be one of them. If so, while you're here I encourage you to think about the nice people, great weather, low cost of living, live music, nationally recognized public schools, BBQ and breakfast tacos, and the growing community of your peers that call this town home. I know all of the people on this post are seeking great talent to join their firms and you might want to drop an inquiry or two while you're here. (Click here for [WCG's] open positions.)

I have no regrets about leaving that brand new house behind in Boston, because we're building the social business capital of the world.

Any interest in joining us?"

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Solis Joins Team Altimeter

Wow! Big news today for Brian Solis and the good folks at research-based advisory firm, Altimeter (Jeremiah Owyang and Charlene Li's gig). According to my friend, Jeremiah, Brian will be joining the firm as a principal focusing on "change management, social business and helping Altimeter's clients adopt disruptive technologies."

Charlene Li, , Brian Solis & Jeremiah Owyang (credit: Solis)
Given Brian's meteoric rise over the last couple of years that culminated with his interview of news anchor, Katie Couric, last fall, this is a big win for Altimeter. It will be interesting to see how Brian -- a two time author that cut his teeth in the PR world -- will make the leap to analyst. Given the content Brian creates and covers on his blog, I have not doubt that if anyone can make the shift, Brian can.

By way of fun background, I've done podcasts with Charlene (co-interviewing Charlene with Jim Storer at the Community 2.0 Conference in 2008), Brian (TechSet, 2009) and Jeremiah (via the phone). I know all three personally and am excited for them as this will be big news for a group that is already moving and shaking. When you see them at SXSW, make sure to congratulate them!

To that end, Altimeter's growth won't stop with Solis. According to Jeremiah, they are also hiring in a few other fields such as mobile, business intelligence, and digital media and advertising.

Bizzy Checks Out

Over the past few months, my co-author, Mike Schneider, and I have been keeping a closer eye on local business recommendation engine, Bizzy. Mike and I have both know VP of marketing, Ryan Kuder and community manager, Elysa Rice for a while. And I was lucky enough to have Ryan on the Quick'n'Dirty podcast show a few months back (Ryan was definitely one of our more engaging guests).

The reason I bring up Bizzy is that they are announced a groundbreaking new feature today called the "check-out." Yes, many of us that use location based services like foursquare and Gowalla are quite familiar with the concept of "checking-in" to a location. But checking out? What's that all about. Well, the key is that Bizzy doesn't care which service you use to check in. But when you are ready to check out, you can leave a simple review. As you can see in the screen shot to the left, this can be as simple as picking one of the three faces to let you know what you thought of the business you just patronized. Or, you can leave a Twitter-esque review that gets added to the tip of that particular venue.

Bizzy was kind enough to let Mike and I play with this functionality for the last week or so. My initial thoughts are that I like the new functionality a lot. In particular, I liked the ability to add my $.02 on the location I was visiting which I often forget to do when I'm checking into a venue. The interface was very easy to use given how simple and straightforward it was.

With that said, there are a couple of things I'd like to see in the future:
  1. It would be nice if Bizzy physically checked you out of the location using the service you checked in with e.g. Gowalla, Facebook Places, foursquare. I know this is tricky because I don't believe any of these services currently offer up a "limbo" or "I'm not checked in anywhere" state which would be required.
  2. I know I was testing an alpha version of the product (using a very cool development environment called Test Flight) but sometimes I couldn't always find the venue I checked into to check out of. For instance, I went to a local festival here in Austin on Sunday and while I was able to check in on Gowalla [Austin Kite Festival at Zilker Park], I wasn't able to check out on Bizzy. Hopefully this is a matter of expanding the geo-database over time and making it more real time.
If you don't use Bizzy yet, I'd suggest checking it out. They provide some great local recommendations based on information you provide. And with the added bonus of the check out, you can now review all your favorite (or un-favorite) venues in seconds.

Monday, March 7, 2011

With LBS Announcements Looming, What Motivates People to Check-in Anyway?

The following is one in a series of guest posts on the Citizen Marketer 2.1 blog. Today's post is brought to you by Jill McFarland. In addition to being a friend, Jill is the VP of Marketing at TangoTab, a new restaurant industry social solution. She is also an avid Boston sports fan and a fellow location based services junkie.

With all the buzz swirling around about the many announcements to be made by the LBS players at SXSW I’ve got to wondering, is there anything a service could do that could catapult them into the lead and give them ‘mainstream’ status. When Facebook Places launched there seemed to be a general thought that everyone would migrate that way because Facebook already had the audience but this doesn’t seem to be the case (informal study). I attribute this to its lack of innovation; people want more than just the ability to check in.

I came across this article recently Why did Foursquare Succeed Where Other Location-Based Services Failed? which covers many business reasons. I think the most important thing mentioned is ‘a great user experience’… but what does that mean? Jodi Gersh was presenting an LBS session at a conference last year where Jason Falls and I piped in, elaborated and answered questions on services we knew a lot about. What was interesting about this conversation was that Jason and I used and liked the services for completely different reasons. So, I decided to do some crowdsourcing to find out what motivated people to check in, what service they use and why, in order to find out what really mattered.

Summarized findings

To see where friends are/Let them know where I am – this is a motivator for some though not nearly as many as I expected. Some chose a service because it cross-posts with other services:
  • Deals – A BIG motivator, in fact many users cited this as the reason that they are not loyal to one service but use many looking for the best deals and their motivation to check in is to get a deal.
  • Status – Virtual status matters. I was really surprised to learn how much the virtual items collected in Gowalla motivate users to check in. Many are highly motivated to become the mayor regardless of if there are any perks involved. Some got bored with a system when they felt like they maxed out on badges and were no longer virtually earning something.
  • Gaming aspect – SCVNGR seems to be gaining steam with its interactive game feel. I got many “SCVNGR is so cool!” but few seem to use it on a regular basis just to check in, it’s used more when they’re seeking a more interactive experience.
  • Reviews – many used services to read reviews and leave reviews.
  • Timeline – Some like that Whrrl and Gowalla keep a timeline and tell a story of your life, including photos and friends.
  • Ease of use/ It doesn’t crash - If locations don’t load or there are extra steps users will abandon a service and not look back. I got this response way more often than I anticipated. Users are motivated to use the app that provides the best user experience, consistently.
People often tell me I live in the early adopter bubble and am unaware that the majority of the population still doesn’t care about or use LBS. Although we know there are big announcements to be made at SXSW I’m wondering could anything be announced that could change that? Security (fear) is still going to be an issue when it comes to reaching critical mass adoption. Each day we see more variety in partnerships. Foursquare recently announced a unique partnership with American Express, SCVNGR with Dunkin’ Donuts targeting Boston sports fans, Whrrl has formed many interesting partnerships. The continuation of partnerships that make sense will help. Aaron and Mike’s book Location Based Marketing for Dummies will help. [wink]

What do you think? Is reaching critical mass important or should the focus be on continuing to innovate for those that are adopting?

Thursday, March 3, 2011

I'm 'Checking In' at WCG: As Head of Location Based Marketing (aka Truck Day)

UPDATED as of 8:15 AM CT
A good friend who is much smarter than me gracefully hinted at me moving the meat of my news further up. So I've created a few bullets at the top of the post for those of you that like to skim.

The News
  • After 2 1/2 years, I'm leaving Powered/Dachis and headed to head up mobile/location based marketing and social strategy at WCG, a global agency offering integrated creative, interactive and marketing communications services to clients in healthcare, consumer products and technology.
  • As you'll read below, I have nothing but mad respect for Jeff, Peter, Kate, Natanya and all my former teammates at Powered/Dachis. But this opportunity was too good to pass up.
  • For any of you that don't know, I'm writing a book on location based marketing w/ Mike Schneider - more on that later.
  • The full press release and a short video I did with my new friend and colleague, Paul Dyer, can be found here.

Monday, February 21, 2011

5 Lessons Businesses Can Learn from the Just Bieber Experience [podcast]

Yes, I saw The Justin Bieber Experience yesterday against my better judgement (kids choice). However, in spite of still not being a big fan of his music, I came away much more impressed than I thought I would. In fact, I was so impressed with Bieber's approach that I did a quick podcast today on five lessons businesses can learn from Justin Bieber.

[updated: couldn't resist adding a link to this video -- hat tip to John Johansen for finding/sending -- of James Earl Jones reading lyrics to Bieber's Baby Baby song. Brilliant!

Marketing in Social Networks: The Importance of Context

As some of you know, I'm in the process of writing the Location Based Marketing for Dummies book with Mike Schneider. As a result, my blog has suffered. To help fill in the gaps, I'm slotting in some guest posts. Today's guest contribution was submitted by Tara Miller who regularly writes for psychology degree.

When marketing your business online, especially in the world of social media, it's important to understand that the term 'social' is a general sort of term. When it comes to marketing within different types of social networks, you have to make sure that you keep in mind the different contexts within which members of these networks operate. Keeping these contexts in mind and adapting your marketing strategies to take advantage of this context can help as you reach out to potential clients or customers in each network.

Two of the most popular social networks out there are Twitter and Facebook, and to the untrained eye, these two networks seem similar. In both cases, you connect with fellow users, share media and other bits of information and you create relationships that can benefit you in other areas of your life. But how can you adjust your marketing for each one?

In the case of Twitter, you have to keep in mind that when you market your blog or products, you have to keep the stream of marketing well within Twitter's 140 character limitations. The message you can communicate is greatly limited in that sense; yes, Twitter now has applications within the site that let users view images and video without leaving the site, but these are still a bit clumsy to use. Likewise, it's a bit harder to follow conversations in Twitter, so anything beyond a few back and forths can be too long for a user to stick with. But this brevity within Twitter does have its advantages; it allows you to really punch up and emphasize the relevance of your message, while at the same time directing users to seek out more context at your main blog or website by following links. Twitter gives you the ability to impress upon your users a simple, but powerful message.

Facebook, however, has the advantage of allowing its users to engage in more complicated types of media; the developers have done a good job of making that a streamlined part of the Facebook experience, so it's much easier for you to take advantage of. While Facebook users also demand timely and up-to-date information, they also have more patience to allow conversations to develop and to experience more static pages. Conversations within Facebook are also threaded, which allows for more contextual conversations versus those on Twitter. On your wall and in your feed, you can post status updates regarding how your product or blog has changed, or what's new for you and your company. You can seek out users who friend you or who exist in similar niches, and interact with them on their own walls. But be wary that Facebook does not usurp your internet presence, as it's very easy for Facebook users to stay online only within the realm of that one site.

Ultimately, if any marketing concept holds true in both social networks, it is this: you cannot automate your marketing in social networks. You must engage users personally and especially. If you can do this well and efficiently, then you can count on users to gravitate towards your brand in a positive way.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The Art of Book Marketing: Past, Present & Future

This post originally appeared on Shelton Interactive's blog back in December as a guest post.

Writing a book is tricky business. I know because I'm in the process of doing so as I write this post. Marketing a book after it's published can be equally difficult for a few different reasons:
  1. There is a LOT of content out there right now. Some good, some bad, some meh, but all of that content on a variety of different topics makes it difficult to break through the clutter.
  2. Publishers often don't pony up a lot of money to market new books. That doesn't mean they never put marketing muscle behind a book. Just not a lot. Instead, they rely on the author to hire a publicist that can hopefully propel the book into Amazon's or the NY Times' best seller lists.
  3. Slowly but surely, social media is making its way into the mix. But authors that are new to social media are finding that it takes more than a month or two to tap into the benefits of social. And those that have been doing social for a while aren't necessarily the ones writing the books.
For me, I've had the benefit of some past, present and soon to be future experience with book marketing. In the latter case, I'm the one writing the book. In the former instances, it was a boss or a colleague that wrote the books and I've been on the hook to help them get the word out.

In the spirit of being prescriptive, I'm including a "what worked, what didn't and what I would have done differently" for the past and present books I helped market. In the case of my Location Based Marketing for Dummies book that I'm writing with my friend, Mike Schneider, I've spelled out a few things that we hope will work based on past experience. I also have a dozen or so friends that have written books and I've included a few at the end of this post that I think did a good job marketing their respective books.

The Past
Back in 2006, not a lot of people knew about social media. In some ways, this was a good thing. In other ways, it made marketing a book about social media (or more specifically, using a community of people to crowd source a book on a wiki platform) that much harder. The book I'm referencing was cleverly titled, We Are Smarter Than Me, and was a collection of case studies provided by "the crowd."
  • What worked: Content creation i.e. podcasts with individuals or representatives from companies mentioned in the book. This helped to extend the book beyond its physical cover and was great SEO juice for the book website.
  • What didn't work: While many of the constituents that helped contributed to the book were actively engaged early on in the book writing process, we lost momentum for the six months that it took to get the book through it's official publishing process.
  • What could have been done different: Better outreach to the companies mentioned in the book to get them to buy the book in bulk.
The Present
During my tenure here at Powered, I've actually had the benefit marketing two books. One by my colleague, Joseph Jaffe, titled Flip the Funnel, and a second by colleague, Greg Verdino, titled microMarketing. Because the promotion of Greg's book is more recent, I'm going to focus on that one versus Joe's.
  • What worked: Greg and his publicist, PTA, came up with the idea of asking bloggers to review individual chapters of Greg's book versus the entire book. This way, we were able to get more of them engaged and lined up several chapter reviews a day for 10 days. The foundational post (and a review of Chapter One) can be found here on Citizen Marketer 2.1.
  • What didn't work: Unfortunately, Greg is a busy guy (his full time job is VP of strategy here at Powered). While Greg is always more than willing to speak at events, webinars and take interviews, his day job keeps him focused on delivering client work instead of book promoting. This is good for Powered but tough for Greg as an author.
  • What could have been done different: In a perfect world, I would have loved to have spent more marketing dollars against getting Greg to more events and pushing for more press coverage and earned media.
The Future
As I mentioned earlier, I'm co-authoring a book titled, Location Based Marketing for Dummies. In the plus column, this is a book that is part of a well-known series that our publisher, Wiley, has been supporting for years. It's also focusing on a topic that is near and dear to my heart. At the same time, I know there are people with a natural bias against Dummies books and while I'm thrilled to be a part of it, it's definitely not the same as writing a book from scratch. But with that said, I do plan to market the hell out of it starting now.
  • What (we hope) will work: We've already secured a URL for the book and we plan to start writing posts that talk about location based marketing. We'll also talk about the book writing process, include video and podcast interviews from the companies we talk to and keep a running list of sources we're using for source material. By building our "followership" early and often, we're hoping that we'll have a built in audience who wants to buy the book when it comes out.
  • What (we hope we don't have to say) didn't work: Mike and I never want to come off as too sale-sy. If we ever get accused of that, I know both of us will be disappointed.
  • What we hope to do different: Combine the power of the "Dummies series" marketing engine with Mike's and my social knowhow to create a winning product that people want to buy when it's published. Part of what will make this successful is our continuous engagement with our constituents along the way.
So who are a few of the other authors who have done a great job marketing their books? Here are five (if you want to know why, you have to ask me in the comments):

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Is RSS Dead?

A few months ago I was on a panel at InnoTech with friends Kyle Flaherty, Bryan Person and Sheila Scarborough. The focus of the panel was on the future of social media and one of the topics that came up was RSS. Being the troublemaker that I am, I firmly asserted that RSS as we know it was dead. You can imagine the horror of the 200 plus audience members.

As we dug a little deeper into the topic, I backed off my position and clarified that while I didn't really think that RSS was dead, I did feel like we were nearing the end of the usefulness of RSS readers. Some of my panelists agreed with me (I believe that Sheila strongly objected) but we were able to have a productive conversation about the increasing value of XML feeds (that's all RSS really is) while the value of individual readers was on the wane.

Today, the conversation came up again with a gentleman whose shall remain nameless but let's just say that he is a pioneer in the space and I was pleased to hear that he agreed with me. And while I know at least half of you that read this (all three of you) will insist that you still read blogs regularly via your RSS reader of choice, I'm going to argue that you are a dying breed.

Why do I believe that RSS readers are going the way of the VHS tape? Mainly because they don't really allow for good curation. And by that, I mean that unless I'm reading an RSS feed of blogs that someone I know and trust like David Armano or Robert Scoble have "read" and "liked," than I'm forced to do a lot of hunting and pecking. This doesn't mean I don't like the blogs of smarties such as Joe Jaffe, Valeria MaltoniPeter Kim, Jay Baer or Tamsen McMahon. It just means that not all of their posts appeal to me (and I'm quite sure the opposite is true). Combine that with the fact that I enjoy discovering new sources of content -- and let's be honest, there are tons of new content creators coming on the scene every day --and you'll at least understand where I'm coming from.

Before you say it, I realize that Twitter alone ISN'T the solution to better content curation. In fact, Twitter can sometimes make it harder to find the right content unless you have the right human filters. I find mine in people like Ann Handley, Lee Odden, Steve Rubel, Amber NaslundSimon Mainwaring, Brian Morrissey, and Rachel Happe among dozens of others. So what is the solution? I'm not sure. A better Flipboard perhaps? A new and improved Delicious? If you know of one, I'm all ears.

Okay, this is the point where I turn things over and let all you folks that are smarter than me tell me the error of my ways. So comment away my friends. You know I love to be proved wrong.

POST SCRIPT: Here is an audio follow-on by friend and smart dude, Ike Pigott.

Monday, January 10, 2011


A couple of years ago, I remember my friend Mukund Mohan asking on Twitter how many channels people had engaged on in a particular day. I was always amazed when I sat back and thought about the fact that I was usually somewhere near 10-11 which included things like:

  • The phone (landline)
  • Cell phone
  • Twitter
  • Facebook (which now has several sub-channels)
  • E-mail
  • Skype
  • Text messages
  • Face-2-face
  • Blog (via comments)
  • IM (AIM, Yahoo and/or g-chat)
  • Discussion forums
While the number of channels continues to proliferate, my preferences continue to stay the same. What's amazing to me is that more people don't pick up on other people's preferred methods of communicating. In particular, this is an important notion when it comes to one's boss, respective other, family and increasingly, in influencer outreach.

For me, I have about three channels that I like to communicate in (and I'm guessing you won't be surprised):
  1. E-mail
  2. Twitter
  3. Text messaging
My three least favorite?
  1. Phone (landline)
  2. Cell phone
  3. IM (increasingly Facebook IM)
Now that doesn't mean that I don't like using IM with certain people. My co-author, Mike Schneider, and  I use Skype regularly to communicate about our book. It's also an invaluable tool during the Quick'n'Dirty podcast I do with Jennifer Leggio. And recently, I've found it humorous when my three year old daughter Skype calls me AND then manages to turn on the video functionality on my wife's computer. But this is a fairly private channel for me and I don't necessarily want everyone using it. It's also interruptive and requires me to stop what I'm doing to pay attention.

I also don't mind being on the phone sometimes. But it really is my least favorite channel. I'm not sure where my dislike of the phone stems from but what I will say is that my relationship with my wife has improved 1,000 fold now that we primarily use text to communicate when we aren't able to talk face to face. And with respect to everyone, I like my wife a whole lot better than I like a lot of other people.

Where am I going with this post? To the world of business of course and the fact that now, more than ever, businesses big and small need to be more in tune with how their customers want to engage them. If it's Twitter, then provide Twitter customer service... the same hours that you provide phone support. Or IM. Or via Facebook. Or on Skype (like AT&T does which is brilliant by the way).

Unfortunately, I'm still seeing a lot of companies that live in the world of in person, phone or e-mail. And of course most of those are during hours that aren't super convenient for most normal people. Hopefully this will change in 2011 as more and more companies look toward operationalizing social media. But I'm afraid it's going to be a while before we can engage companies in exactly the channels we please, when we please. Until then, I guess it's more "your call is very important to us... please continue to hold and your call will be answered in the order that it was received." Oy.